I am struggling not to be sarcastic here, but this is in no way a logical argument, and this true but completely irrelevant comment is the topper. (Why yes, I did study mathematical logic at a graduate level.)

Look at statement 5. The concepts of mass, space and time come from our experiences, but then you conflate our human concept of mass with mass itself.

This does not follow. Most of us believe that mass, time, space and all these things actually exist outside our heads, and would continue to exist if all humans were gone. To believe otherwise is solipsism, a position which is certainly irrefutable but also has no predictive value at all and ends philosophy and science: "None of this really exists".

Why not actually study what the hard-working and talented people who work in this field have actually said, before believing you have reinvented the wheel?