I make it completely clear that the argument from “association” as you call it that is the centerpiece of your article is logically incorrect.

You are the one who put up that graph of butter vs margarine and argued from it. Not only is that a false argument, but were it true, it would prove the reverse of what you claim.

—

So I’ve read all your four responses. You still provided no actual proof for your claims aside from a single link to the anti-vax, pro-Humorism site. Indeed, you have dismissed out of hand any medical site at all.

Can you explain to me why you believe any of your arguments should convince a skeptical person, given that you have zero proof for them at all?