It's very clear - how? You don't either provide proof, or explain what that perspective is, or what your claim has to do with this article.

For example, one of the big issues around Twitter is that they got rid of all their safeguards against Child Sexual Abuse Material: https://www.techdirt.com/2023/08/01/legal-subreddit-bans-all-ex-twitter-links-due-to-safety-risk/

Content warning: there is no actual filth in that link, but some of the implications of the material are deeply disturbing.

I suppose the idea "Videos of children being raped is bad" is a "perspective" but how is that a useful description.

There's also targeted harassment, hate speech, death threats and the like, all documented in great detail.

Again, it's a "perspective" that harassment and death threats are bad, but "perspective" has no value as a descriptor.

Why don't you go into detail? Examine the points of difference between Twitter and CCDH and expose their "perspective"?