The only content is this quote:

People who are incapable of long hours or heavy lifting or repetitive motions or deep thinking or whatever other demands accompany a specific field of endeavor should seek or create other opportunities.

Let’s first get rid of the straw men here — the article said nothing at all about heavy lifting, repetitive motion, or deep thinking, but only long hours.

And the whole article provides several arguments as to why it’s actually to the benefit of tech companies and society in general to employ people who cannot work long hours.

You don’t address any of these arguments. You simply say, “No, they shouldn’t”, and you don’t explain why.

To summarize: you provide a bare statement, not referencing any of the arguments presented in the article, simply negating the whole thing “because you say so”.