Translation of what you wrote: "I have no refutation for your argument."

Also, you have no idea of what reductio ad absurdum is, because it's a correct form of argument!

If I show someone's reasoning leads to contradictions, then I have disproven their claims.

As a mathematician myself, so much of mathematics is proved by reductio ad absurdum. It's somewhat surrealistic to see someone class it as a fallacy!

----

Just to reiterate my argument - the original comment said this:

"Films and TV shows are art. And art has to provoke emotions. And it shouldn't be mandatory to be "good emotions"."

What, exactly, is the point of this argument? You could use the same argument to defend anything anyone said in a film or movie, no matter how terrible!

And such was my point.