Why? Because you say so?

You make a huge number of claims and justify precisely none of them.

Here’s another:

And, as explored below, there is apparently no mechanism for consciousness in existence or even conceivable in this level of reality

Why? Because you say so? And no, you don’t “explore” anything below.

The whole article is that way. You literally make not one logical argument. It's all "I don't understand consciousness, therefore [something that doesn't follow]."

I don't understand how you even emitted this. Don't you have even a hint of self-criticism? Isn't there some other skeptical person you show your articles to?